by
SloshedAndVexed
@ 2008-08-14 - 22:35:27
I did'nt realise how 'anti-american' I'd become until , yesterday , watching some womens gymnastics from the olympics on tv , I found myself laughing when an american girl tripped off of the beam before she'd even jumped onto it .
I'm sure there are plenty of lovely U.S.A citizens , many of whom will be glad to see the back of their current president , and that not all americans are vulgar show-offs . Of course they are not , and , anti-americanism is not a very noble trait .
I heard on C4 news that , as part of the drive to repopulate our nation with Gordon Brown fans , his government plan to provide free laptops and broadband to the 'poorest' families with children .
I'm by no means anti the internet or unsympathetic to anyone struggling financially , but , how can home pc's and broadband internet be a priority in such a situation , especially with free internet access in public libraries ?
And how come those of my , and my parents generations somehow seemed to manage entirely adequately without computers during our childhoods ? !
The front pages of todays 'Mirror and 'Mail are almost identical , citing "fury" at Colin Stagg's £706,000 compensation for his having been 'set up' by the metropolitan police in an attempted 'sting' operation , designed by the forensic psychologist and 'criminal profiler' Paul Britton , in which an undercover policewoman employed highly dubious tactics to try to get the then 29 year old Mr . Stagg to admit to the savage murder of Rachel Nickell , on wimbledon common , in 1992 .
I've not read the 'Mirror but at least in today's 'Mail they fail to substantiate the alleged 'fury' engendered by his compensation award by quoting anyone claiming to be furious about it . However both attempt to use as a selling point the presumed resentment and jealousy of their readers of a 'working class' man receiving such a substantial award , especially since he's never been found innocent or guilty , of that awful crime , in court .
It's a long story which you probably know , out of which neither Colin Stagg or those involved in the attempted 'entrapment' operation emerge with much credit .
He'd never had a 'proper' girlfriend , was desperate to get one , and the SO10 undercover WPC who befriended him first through letters , then 'phone conversations , then closely monitored meetings in Hyde Park , said sick things to him like that she wished that he had murdered Rachel Nickell , and that she'd only feel able to 'give herself' to a man so strong and dominant as to have viciously stabbed Miss . Nickell 49 times , and sexually assaulted her , in front of her traumatised two year old son .
He always denied being responsible for her murder , though has always admitted being on the common that day , as he was most days .
Though he said sick things like that it excited him to be shown a photo of Miss . Nickell's body by police questioning him about her murder , and he appeared to know details of her murder that he should'nt have known , unless they somehow leaked out from someone involved in the investigation to local residents including him , which is possible .
However , he 'passed' a 'lie-detector test' live on national radio , another man will be going on trial for the murder this November , and I do'nt think that many still seriously belive him responsible for the murder , apart from Rachel Nickell's former partner Andre Hascombe , and Paul Britton , who still maintains that the statistical likelihood of more than one man with the deviant sexual pathology that he ascribes to the murderer , and to Colin Stagg , due to his having written increasingly lurid and violent 'fantasies' to try to please his new 'friend' the undercover WPC 'Lizzie James' ( who retired , and won £200,000 compensation for the 'stress' brought on by her involvement in the investigation ) being in the vicinity of Wimbledon Common on the same day is infintesimally small .
One thing that some recent , and probably some not so recent investigations into some particularly notorious crimes has taught us is that if you are a man living in the vicinity of the crime who could be described as a 'loner' , especially if you show any interest in the case , you'd better have rock-solid alibi's , otherwise you run the risk of an ostensibly believable case for your guilt being formulated , damning lies , exaggerated partial truths or harmless enough but embarrassing truths being published about you in national newspapers , possible imprisonment for any number of years , and then , if you are lucky , sooner or later being officially cleared of suspicion , and perhaps being financially compensated , maybe substantially , whilst having to face some people's name-calling , and jealousy of any compensation , for the rest of your life .