For at least 18 years I've believed that aids/hiv , apart from a few cases caused by infected needles , infected blood supplies , or babies of infected mothers tragically being born with the virus is spread virtually exclusively by back-passage intercourse practised mainly by gay men ,
and that when women are said to have contracted the virus through heterosexual sex what is meant by that is that they have been anally penetrated by bisexual men , or by men from countries where that form of sex is often used in place of contraception .
And consequently that when men contract Aids from sex with women it is through anally penetrating women who have contracted it in that way .
It does'nt affect me personally because for whatever reasons I am celibate but I heard long ago , and still believe that it is very difficult to pass on HiV through penile-vaginal intercourse .
And condoms used by any man practising anal penetration are fine except that if they have a lot of sex , sooner or later one of the condoms is statistically likely to split during the act .
And it's seemed obvious to me for a long time that the official campaign that we are or were all equally at risk was heavily influenced by the gay male 'lobby' striving to avoid stigmatisation of gay men .
Which perversely suited Catholic's and parents who get hysterical at the thought of their teenage offspring conducting sexual experiments who , following the ludicrous government campaign 20 years ago could sanctimoniously dictate that all except married couples should be celibate .
Sorry if anyone's offended by any of the terms I've used but I think that 'Aids' , how it can be contracted or avoided and medical and societal responses to it are very legitimate themes for serious discussion and debate .
My points are that the act which can spread HiV/Aids is not morally wrong but is risky , we are seldom if ever given entirely honest official information about how to contract and avoid Aids and that sensible countries screen would-be immigrants for various communicable diseases .
Subscribe by email
You can receive the posts of this weblog by email.
Last comments
- SloshedAndVexed pro on: that's the way it is
- oldbill on: that's the way it is
- cassieb on: 'no such thing as conspiracy' (2)
- SloshedAndVexed pro on: 'no such thing as conspiracy' (2)
- SeasideMan pro on: 'no such thing as conspiracy' (2)
- SloshedAndVexed pro on: THOUGHTS For Tonight . .
- crazyrainbowblondie on: THOUGHTS For Tonight . .
- SloshedAndVexed pro on: Worst Case Scenario ?
- jenray pro on: Worst Case Scenario ?
- SloshedAndVexed pro on: Worst Case Scenario ?
- Show more
Friends (30)
Search
Archives
- October 2008 (9)
- September 2008 (30)
- August 2008 (31)
- July 2008 (32)
- June 2008 (33)
- May 2008 (40)
- April 2008 (33)
- March 2008 (35)
- February 2008 (38)
- January 2008 (46)
- December 2007 (34)
- November 2007 (42)
- October 2007 (31)
- September 2007 (31)
- August 2007 (31)
- July 2007 (34)
- June 2007 (28)
- May 2007 (23)
- April 2007 (25)
- March 2007 (4)
- more...
Calendar
Archives for: October 2007, 02
HiV/Aids:The Truth ?
by SloshedAndVexed
@ 2007-10-02 - 11:45:57












