by
SloshedAndVexed
@ 2007-05-24 - 16:17:05
I Just came across the famous adage 'Hell Hath No Fury Like A Woman Scorned' on someones 'blog here , and , if that is so , why are women so arrogant as to think they are so high and mighty that anyone who crosses them deserves furious revenge ?
I know , that's provocative and unfair on most women who , like most men , just want to get on with their lives as best they can and can't be bothered with any elaborate revenge scenarios .
It is only human to feel intensely hurt , betrayed and humiliated to discover that the spouse or partner who
we have been faithful to has not been faithful to us , or has abandoned us in an extremely nasty , apparently calculatedly hurtful way , as happened to me , and for that to turn to anger and thoughts of revenge , but as for that being 'a dish best served cold' , I personally can't be bothered to , and it just does'nt seem morally justifiable to pre-meditatedly plan and execute some nasty revenge .
It is generally thought that whilst men tend to respond more 'in the heat of the moment' , women tend to take more time and planning to unleash their anger , and it seems to be generally considered admirable and entertaining when we hear of a woman having done that , and that , if a man did the same thing he'd just be labelled a bastard .
My point is that of course we're all fallable , and , in some circumstances there may be some justification in hitting back in some way but that it is arrogant and wrong for anyone to think that they are so damn important that anyone who p***es them off deserves pain and humiliation .
And , referring back to my last but one post I do yearn for a close relationship with a woman , but am not stupid and am not likely to find one on this site so am not looking to , and , as for the 'cybersex' thing : Tried it once , years ago , and , each to their own but it did so little for me that I've not felt inspired to try it again .